natasha nice and jessie lee in “wives with secret lives”
scene title: wives with secret lives
performers: natasha nice, jessie lee
site: turning twistys ◅ twistys (mindgeek)
production credits: none listed
trailer
the turning twistys series has brought scenario-oriented porn to the forefront of twistys for the first time in basically forever: the site's roots in pure glamour photography mean that the visuals have always led scenes, with scenario an afterthought or forgettable piece of fluff. i'm not going to say that they're now telling sophisticated stories; this is still one of the most basic porn setups available: new neighbor drops in on unsatisfied wife, fucks her ragged while oblivious husband (once more the mvp of nonsex roles, will pounder) putters around the kitchen. but the knowing seduction is nicely played, and while it's preposterous throughout both performers commit so strongly that i can't help rooting for them.
the visual contrast between the angular, heavily tattooed jessie lee and the rounded curves of natasha nice still do a lot of heavy lifting. both of them have been in the industry for over a decade, navigating through very different lanes (jessie is a burning angel regular, while natasha is a longtime pinup whose primary focus is camming) with hardy success. their performances were thoroughly credible despite the hyperbolically improbable scenario and deeply bizarre sex positions that mindgeek apparently mandated. the lengthy tribbing-in-doggy sequence is a fourth-grader's idea of what sex might be like, but they go so hard they almost make me believe they're enjoying it.
the trouble with a scenario-driven scene is that you have to put in the work to keep it alive. girlsway's occasional "almost caught" series, in which the participants are interrupted by an authority figure throughout, is the standard here, which this scene initially seems like it's going to be an imitation of: the frisson of sexual activity while the husband is just in the other room and can walk in on them at any moment is there. but once they shift to the couch set, the scenario is dropped entirely and the husband never appears again until the pointless coda. which is why my script score is so low despite enjoying the setup thoroughly.
i would swear to it that the director here was holly randall (natasha in particular is lit so luminously that i can't see it being anyone else), but of course there are no credits. the photography is luscious; colors, lighting, framing and composition everything they should be; but the cameras are stultifyingy static with rare exception. and there was enough off-camera noise that i kept expecting it to be a prelude to will pounder coming in, distraught.
performances: 24
cinematography: 21
editing: 17
script: 9
sjw points: 2
total score:
performers: natasha nice, jessie lee
site: turning twistys ◅ twistys (mindgeek)
production credits: none listed
trailer
 |
| l: natasha nice, r: jessie lee |
the turning twistys series has brought scenario-oriented porn to the forefront of twistys for the first time in basically forever: the site's roots in pure glamour photography mean that the visuals have always led scenes, with scenario an afterthought or forgettable piece of fluff. i'm not going to say that they're now telling sophisticated stories; this is still one of the most basic porn setups available: new neighbor drops in on unsatisfied wife, fucks her ragged while oblivious husband (once more the mvp of nonsex roles, will pounder) putters around the kitchen. but the knowing seduction is nicely played, and while it's preposterous throughout both performers commit so strongly that i can't help rooting for them.
the visual contrast between the angular, heavily tattooed jessie lee and the rounded curves of natasha nice still do a lot of heavy lifting. both of them have been in the industry for over a decade, navigating through very different lanes (jessie is a burning angel regular, while natasha is a longtime pinup whose primary focus is camming) with hardy success. their performances were thoroughly credible despite the hyperbolically improbable scenario and deeply bizarre sex positions that mindgeek apparently mandated. the lengthy tribbing-in-doggy sequence is a fourth-grader's idea of what sex might be like, but they go so hard they almost make me believe they're enjoying it.
the trouble with a scenario-driven scene is that you have to put in the work to keep it alive. girlsway's occasional "almost caught" series, in which the participants are interrupted by an authority figure throughout, is the standard here, which this scene initially seems like it's going to be an imitation of: the frisson of sexual activity while the husband is just in the other room and can walk in on them at any moment is there. but once they shift to the couch set, the scenario is dropped entirely and the husband never appears again until the pointless coda. which is why my script score is so low despite enjoying the setup thoroughly.
i would swear to it that the director here was holly randall (natasha in particular is lit so luminously that i can't see it being anyone else), but of course there are no credits. the photography is luscious; colors, lighting, framing and composition everything they should be; but the cameras are stultifyingy static with rare exception. and there was enough off-camera noise that i kept expecting it to be a prelude to will pounder coming in, distraught.
performances: 24
cinematography: 21
editing: 17
script: 9
sjw points: 2
total score:
Comments
Post a Comment