rachael cavalli and abby adams in “a not so secret snatch admirer”
scene title: a not so secret snatch admirer
performers: rachael cavalli, abby adams
site: dyked ◅ team skeet (paper street)
production credits: none listed
trailer
wow, this was hot garbage.
there's a seed of an interesting story here: teen who finds herself accidentally locked out of her parents' home while they're away for the weekend takes refuge in the home of the older woman next door and seduces her isn't the most original idea in the world, but there are possibilities there. but even though the intro to the sex seemed to drag on forever, including multiple changes of clothing, so little happened that once the sex started it felt more like they were finally getting on with the porn than like it was the natural next step in their erotic journey.
neither performer is any great shakes as an actor, although rachael cavalli at least has the self-possession of maturity. but abby adams as the instigator of sexual contact is singularly bad at taking any real charge, taking forever to do anything. to be fair to her, she may have expected the editors to to their job and cut down a meandering, repetitive sequence into something narratively fulfilling; instead she looks like a fool slapping rachael's ass and trying desperately to think of something new to say about it for five whole minutes. the idea of the teen being sexually aggressive and even slightly dominating the shocked older woman is novel enough to be appealing; but that novelty was squandered on futzing around and repetitive, unimaginative dirty talk.
the sex, once it finally got underway, was similarly underwhelming. i don't ever claim to know whether a performer is faking sexual pleasure, but what i will say is that if they were experiencing any they did not communicate it effectively to the camera. equally, the camera failed to be in a position to effectively receive any such communication. piss-poor framing, terrible angles and positioning, and bland, uninvolved staging meant that the bulk of the scene was about as visually interesting as an afternoon bus ride, and masturbating to it just about as inappropriate.
the editing is probably the worst culprit, though: even given the hands-off filmmaking, the tepid performances, and the unimaginative script, an interesting scene could possibly have been salvaged from this footage. (the brazzers editing team, for example, might have made it watchable.) instead, every beat seemed to drag on forever, turning the slightest interaction between them into a full-body cringe.
this is the last appearance team skeet (or any of the paper street sites) will make on this blog. i can't say i'm going to miss them. every last one of their scenes i've watched has felt like people who would rather be making (not very good) boy/girl porn going through the motions of girl/girl without taking the slightest interest in it.
performances: 14
cinematography: 11
editing: 9
script: 8
sjw points: 2
total score:
performers: rachael cavalli, abby adams
site: dyked ◅ team skeet (paper street)
production credits: none listed
trailer
 |
| l: rachael cavalli, r: abby adams |
wow, this was hot garbage.
there's a seed of an interesting story here: teen who finds herself accidentally locked out of her parents' home while they're away for the weekend takes refuge in the home of the older woman next door and seduces her isn't the most original idea in the world, but there are possibilities there. but even though the intro to the sex seemed to drag on forever, including multiple changes of clothing, so little happened that once the sex started it felt more like they were finally getting on with the porn than like it was the natural next step in their erotic journey.
neither performer is any great shakes as an actor, although rachael cavalli at least has the self-possession of maturity. but abby adams as the instigator of sexual contact is singularly bad at taking any real charge, taking forever to do anything. to be fair to her, she may have expected the editors to to their job and cut down a meandering, repetitive sequence into something narratively fulfilling; instead she looks like a fool slapping rachael's ass and trying desperately to think of something new to say about it for five whole minutes. the idea of the teen being sexually aggressive and even slightly dominating the shocked older woman is novel enough to be appealing; but that novelty was squandered on futzing around and repetitive, unimaginative dirty talk.
the sex, once it finally got underway, was similarly underwhelming. i don't ever claim to know whether a performer is faking sexual pleasure, but what i will say is that if they were experiencing any they did not communicate it effectively to the camera. equally, the camera failed to be in a position to effectively receive any such communication. piss-poor framing, terrible angles and positioning, and bland, uninvolved staging meant that the bulk of the scene was about as visually interesting as an afternoon bus ride, and masturbating to it just about as inappropriate.
the editing is probably the worst culprit, though: even given the hands-off filmmaking, the tepid performances, and the unimaginative script, an interesting scene could possibly have been salvaged from this footage. (the brazzers editing team, for example, might have made it watchable.) instead, every beat seemed to drag on forever, turning the slightest interaction between them into a full-body cringe.
this is the last appearance team skeet (or any of the paper street sites) will make on this blog. i can't say i'm going to miss them. every last one of their scenes i've watched has felt like people who would rather be making (not very good) boy/girl porn going through the motions of girl/girl without taking the slightest interest in it.
performances: 14
cinematography: 11
editing: 9
script: 8
sjw points: 2
total score:
Comments
Post a Comment